An interactive lesson plan for teachers to design effective body language workshops
.png)
The fifth-grade English teacher I partnered with noticed that many students struggled with body language during class presentations, showing limited eye contact, nervous gestures, and difficulty engaging the whole audience.
A two-part, video-based lesson plan that integrates teacher-led group activities and individual exercises. The key principles include social-emotional learning, active learning, gamification, metacognitive theory, and scaffolding.
.png)
%20(1).png)
The following graph illustrates how each step in the learning journey supports targeted performance outcomes.
.png)
Performance Analysis: To understand competency components for students to use body language effectively.
Learner Analysis: To break down cognitive, affective, and behavioral factors contributing to current underperformance.
Learning Target Analysis: To pinpoint learning targets to bridge the gap between learners' current states and the desired performance.
Learning Experience Design: To designing learning materials and events around the identified targets.
Assessment Design: To integrating formative and summative assessment into the lesson plan.
.png)
According to effective public speaking, the goal of a presentation is to influence the audience’s perspective or emotions through an engaging delivery of information and ideas. To master body language, a speaker must develop the following competencies:
Content Knowledge and Emotional Awareness: Thoroughly understanding the content being presented, including both the informational and emotional impacts intended for the audience.
Body Language Understanding: Knowing the meanings and emotional connotations that different body languages convey.
Confidence and Familiarity for Application: Being comfortable and confident to use body languages in group settings.

Through observations of student presentation recordings and interviews with the teacher, I identified four key performance gaps:
Lack of Content Familiarity: Limited clarity with the information and emotions they aim to convey.
Lack of Body Language Knowledge: Unfamiliarity with different body language cues and how they influence the audience's perception.
Lack of Self-awareness: Limited awareness of their appearance and performance on stage due to perspective constraints.
Lack of Confidence: Emotional barriers such as fear of making mistakes or receiving negative feedback from peers.
.png)
To bridge the gaps, I identified the learning targets using the Schwartz & Hartman Wheel, a framework that matches learning objectives, instructional strategies, and assessment methods with performance categories for effective design.

To achieve the main skill gain, I further broke it down into three sub-targets:
Discernment: Differentiate between various types of body language.
Explanation: Understand the communicative effects of different body languages, and develop familiarity with their content and stage performance.
Attitude: Build confidence in using body language in presentation.
.png)
Using the Schwartz Wheel, I created focused assessments targeting each of the learning goals:
Formative assessment for Discernment -- Noticing: Assess students' ability to identify and recognize different poses and gestures displayed by public speakers.
Formative assessment for Explanation -- Inference: Evaluate students' capability to interpret the meanings behind different gestures and connect them to their own content.
Formative explanation for Attitude -- Manner: Measure the extent to which students exhibit confident manners in using body language
Summative explanation for Skill -- Performance: An overall evaluation of students' proficiency in applying their knowledge of appropriate body language during formal presentations
The following graph summarizes how different parts of the analysis connect and how they contribute to effective learning experience design collectively.
.png)
.png)